<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Iowa Leadership &#187; Iowa Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ialeadership.com/category/iowa-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ialeadership.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:29:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>With the Iowa ruling, is social conservatism in politics on its deathbed?</title>
		<link>http://www.ialeadership.com/with-the-iowa-ruling-is-social-conservatism-in-politics-on-its-deathbed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ialeadership.com/with-the-iowa-ruling-is-social-conservatism-in-politics-on-its-deathbed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iowa Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deathbed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ialeadership.com/with-the-iowa-ruling-is-social-conservatism-in-politics-on-its-deathbed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There aren&#8217;t riots in the streets in Iowa.  It seems that Americans are rapidly growing less and less patient with the (shrinking) group of extremist, hypocritical bigots dictating what is right and wrong the rest of us.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There aren&#8217;t riots in the streets in Iowa.  It seems that Americans are rapidly growing less and less patient with the (shrinking) group of extremist, hypocritical bigots dictating what is right and wrong the rest of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ialeadership.com/with-the-iowa-ruling-is-social-conservatism-in-politics-on-its-deathbed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Iowa suggest that smear politics now backfires?</title>
		<link>http://www.ialeadership.com/does-iowa-suggest-that-smear-politics-now-backfires/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ialeadership.com/does-iowa-suggest-that-smear-politics-now-backfires/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iowa Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backfires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suggest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ialeadership.com/does-iowa-suggest-that-smear-politics-now-backfires/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Romney spent millions in negative campaign ads and he still lost badly. There are reports that Romney lost precisely because he went negative and lost  votes because people are tired of smear politics.
Are the days of smear over and will it now backfire on candidates that go negative?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Romney spent millions in negative campaign ads and he still lost badly. There are reports that Romney lost precisely because he went negative and lost  votes because people are tired of smear politics.</p>
<p>Are the days of smear over and will it now backfire on candidates that go negative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ialeadership.com/does-iowa-suggest-that-smear-politics-now-backfires/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
